SoccerProject

i would support the increase of the prizes only for the first 9 or 10 rounds or so. afterwards, the prizes are pretty good already.

this measure that you are proposing will rise the salaries of the players and advantage the teams with more money. i'm against it.

i looked at an older post of yours and saw that you propose the money should be tied up for the period in bank. my assumption about this option was that you can retreat the money should it be necessary. since you can pay early the loan, it would be normal to be able to take the money back, at an int...

what would that mean?

in some games, it may make a difference. and it's also an interesting option.
even more interesting it would be if during the simulations, there would be made subs according to the situation of the team. if it loses, draws or wins (this was proposed already). however, it seems complicated to achieve.

maybe it can be done like this:
in the individual order window, there will appear also the five substitutes, and you can select an individual order for them.
if the substitute is to used on his position, the special order will apply. if not, it won't.

it seems quite easy to do it...

i think this would increase the incentives for cheating and make it even harder for the sheriffs to handle the phenomenon. then, it is a football management game. if you put betting as an option, it may end up for a part of the managers as a betting game and they would lose most of the capital not f...

You hit the head on the nail, my friend. In economic theory savings actually decrease inflation if the interest is under the average market growth. In theory that is correct and now I can see what you mean. However, you missed an important detail. This game's economy is different from the natural e...

As an economic unit, there is money coming into the game, money coming out of the game, and money exchanging hands between managers. All that really matters is what the totals of each of these are, not the names of each of the functions. For example, money leaves the game through salaries, agent fe...

I'm surprized to see there are no replies to this one..

You hit the head on the nail, my friend. In economic theory savings actually decrease inflation if the interest is under the average market growth. In theory that is correct and now I can see what you mean. However, you missed an important detail. This game's economy is different from the natural e...

it's not the savings that will increase inflation, but the interest on the money deposed. and of course it will increase inflation, but with the limitations proposed above, only slightly..

i don't believe that this will increase the overall inflation. it will just apply for a part of the market, not all of it, and may actually decrease the prices for some of the players, especially bp 64-67 (estimate), as now, the potential buyers will be aware of the full offer of players. the visibl...

Establishing a minimum price to be paid will make it harder for the new teams to grow otherwise than through speculation with players, which i think is not all right. There should be bargains and there should be the possibility to grow decently without an excessive number of transfers. Granting a te...

This has been proposed in the transfer number limitation topic, but I think it deserves more attention. In short, the proposal would be to increase the percent of the total amount paid to the agent and the previous team to about 10% total - 8% to previous team and 2% to the agent. or 7 and 3 maybe. ...