Search found 25 matches
- Fri Jul 25, 2008 8:19 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: manage 2 teams
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6782
Re: manage 2 teams
I saw in more games feature, that you could be allowed to play 2 teams when keeping some predefined rules. The advantage is that Sjarel you may get some money for it and still it would be controlled ... e.g. no transfers between those 2 teams no whatever ... Additionally, it is pretty hard to contr...
- Fri Jul 25, 2008 8:16 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: player apparels
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2088
- Fri Jul 25, 2008 8:13 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Penalty or free kick with yellow/red card
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4301
- Fri Jul 25, 2008 8:05 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Country message board
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3538
- Fri Jun 06, 2008 5:27 am
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Injured goalkeepers
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3928
- Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:33 am
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Selecting captain for game
- Replies: 12
- Views: 8303
Well guys I don't think this topic is worth fighting for. Well if the feature is implemented it will only save a minute or 2. Another way is to use SPMT. It will tell you who is suitable for captain. Or it will be better if you write a small script for urself which will tell you who will be suitable...
- Sun Feb 24, 2008 2:18 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Something should be done about the publicity
- Replies: 30
- Views: 16282
Well terry I hadn't say my solution will be simple. And also I hadn't say that it will be implemented overnight. What I was suggesting that the transfer market should be penalised not the ADV or stadium. If you keep on penalising the ADV boards then the only way remains for getting huge money is fro...
- Sun Feb 24, 2008 2:04 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Anger management sessions
- Replies: 17
- Views: 25650
I think it's a good idea. If people are really concern about the whole team become 0% aggression then I can suggest that make a lower limit. Like the anger management session will make the aggression only till 20-25 not below it. Or say each 10% you lower your player aggression you lose 2% of of you...
- Fri Feb 22, 2008 7:40 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Something should be done about the publicity
- Replies: 30
- Views: 16282
- Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:05 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Something should be done about the publicity
- Replies: 30
- Views: 16282
I think this is what Sjarel etc wants but before you can increase the advertising money and the victory bonus you should take a lot of money out of the game. If you increase that money now there should come a lot more money so the inflation should go very fast and good players should became unpayab...
- Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:19 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Retrain player
- Replies: 30
- Views: 38353
- Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:15 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Something should be done about the publicity
- Replies: 30
- Views: 16282
Why people still get their money from their advertising? Get your money on the Transfer Market, you should look for money where you can find it... @SBroccoli: maybe to do something about the inflation? Yes transfer market is a big source of income (and cheating too). But what we want is atleast an ...
- Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:08 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: choosing the role for new players
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4582
I think such an option would make the game too easy. But I'd consider other options. Like making it depend on some abilities the youth coach has. Or the predominant system your team plays (i.e. more CFs if you usually play with 2 CFs). You shouldn't complain about getting many CFs btw. They are eas...
- Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:04 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Changing the league simulation hour...
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5284
- Sat Feb 09, 2008 6:52 am
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: 'Discriminated' positions
- Replies: 33
- Views: 19348
The logic is very simple guys. Consider the most costly positions: CB, CM, CF (leaving GK whom you need in a match anyway). So in SP with 5 defence system you have 2 formation option : 5-4-1 and 5-3-2 In 5-4-1 system you need 2 CB + 2 CM + 1 CF = 5 Costly Positions In 5-3-2 systems you need 2 CB + 1...