http://forum.soccerproject.com/viewtopi ... 7&t=106411
Suggested a few times and rulled out by Sjarel.
Search found 103 matches
- Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:46 am
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Putting money on the bank/stocks
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4001
- Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:14 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Advertising boards
- Replies: 23
- Views: 13012
Re: Advertising boards
How about tying availability of advertising board to performance? Form WWWWW means all your boards have offers, form LLLLL means you get no offers at all. This makes it closer to reality and creates a new challenge.
- Thu Oct 23, 2008 8:01 am
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Player's age
- Replies: 50
- Views: 52559
Re: Player's age
actually that's what i said :lol: .but the second part is true also.either one of these suggestions would be great if it would be implemented. These two suggestions are very different, and I don't think they should be mentioned under the same topic as I suspect most people here liked the first part...
- Mon Oct 20, 2008 7:55 am
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Player's age
- Replies: 50
- Views: 52559
Re: Player's age
I disagree. And not just for the sake of being different ;-) I’m automatically suspicious of any suggestion raised in this forum whose purpose is to make the game easier. I think this idea is such a suggestion. I agree that in real life things are sometimes different, but that’s not a good enough re...
- Sat Aug 30, 2008 9:16 am
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: suggestion
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7210
- Fri Aug 29, 2008 1:10 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: suggestion
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7210
I understand now. So your suggestion is to be able to reduce the aggression level of players, which is synonymous to increasing the value of aggressive players or being able to train them to be less aggressive. Let me guess – you have too many aggressive players? This isn’t a suggestion for improvem...
- Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:06 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: suggestion
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7210
I don’t get the idea. If you mean that by setting individual aggression, the risk of losing aggressive players to cards is reduced, then your suggestion is to make the game easier and aggressive players more valuable. This would change the whole pricing system and most good teams would lose value dr...
- Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:48 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Independence for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ire
- Replies: 24
- Views: 13872
- Thu Jul 10, 2008 11:14 am
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Independence for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ire
- Replies: 24
- Views: 13872
Copy pasting my comment on this from the last time it was discussed: According to the Fifa website, there are 208 football nations. SP has 234 nations. If people feel strongly about having 4 nations in the UK and no nations that have no actual football leagues, then a manageable solution would be to...
- Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:06 am
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Coach prestige
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10597
I had a look at the rules and you’re actually right, it says: “You can increase your team spirit by playing matches, especially if you win”. I have never actually noticed that. It doesn’t change the essence though. The rest of the rewards you talk about are financial, not performance related. My ide...
- Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:47 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Coach prestige
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10597
I don’t think what you say is correct, and if it is – it’s news to me. I think you gain TS regardless of score. Score (recent form) affects attendance, not performance, and attendance does not affect performance. Promotion and relegation affect fans number, which in turn affects attendance, not perf...
- Wed Jul 02, 2008 11:56 am
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Coach prestige
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10597
… it only rewards certain teams--under your system, a team that finished 2nd in C, then 2nd in B, then relegated, would still have 1 star, while a team that finished 3rd in A three straight years (a far greater accomplishment) would have 0 stars. I agree. I therefore suggest that a coach whose team...
- Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:31 am
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Coach prestige
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10597
But perhaps to satisfy you, the stars could be given to the managers, and have the same influence that zandyy is suggesting? I understand Black_eagle’s point. The reason I suggested the stars will be given to the coach rather than the manager is that this way there could be a price to pay for the i...
- Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:59 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Coach prestige
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10597
- Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:21 pm
- Forum: Requested / Upcoming features
- Topic: Coach prestige
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10597
Coach prestige
My suggestion is for the coach to be able to gather ‘prestige’ points that influence the team’s performance. The actual scale is debatable and the following is just an example: A coach that leads a team to promotion will receive one ‘star’ as long as he served as coach for at least a full season pre...