Player aggression vs. referee strictness
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 10:45 am
Hi all,
Well.. can someone explain to me how the algorithm for this game works in terms of player aggression and referee strictness.
Today I lost a league game against a team with average aggression 91.9. My team had a 10.9. Referee had a 100% strictness. We both set a team aggression at 100%.
At the end my team collected 10 yellows with two reds (no direct reds). The opponent had 11 yellows with one red (no direct red).
So, he had fewer cards than me even though he had a much more aggressive players (91.9 vs.10.9). Even my total performance was better (783 vs.777).
I am very frustrated with this unrealistic outcome.
This is not just about this game. I've noticed that this happens very often when it comes to player aggression and referee strictness, and that the algorithm favors teams with higher aggression players. It's practically impossible to beat a team with high aggression players if they set their team aggression to maximum.
I think that's wrong and very unrealistic.
I've just check all games from the season 119 of the team Er2c. He also has a low aggression players like mine. Minimum 7 games from the last season had an unrealistic outcome.
My next league game is against a similar team with high aggression players and max team aggression and the referee is also has high strictness. It will be interesting to see what will happen.
If there is something in this story that I don't see or understand or am wrong, I would like someone to enlighten me. Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Delboy
Peckham B.1
Well.. can someone explain to me how the algorithm for this game works in terms of player aggression and referee strictness.
Today I lost a league game against a team with average aggression 91.9. My team had a 10.9. Referee had a 100% strictness. We both set a team aggression at 100%.
At the end my team collected 10 yellows with two reds (no direct reds). The opponent had 11 yellows with one red (no direct red).
So, he had fewer cards than me even though he had a much more aggressive players (91.9 vs.10.9). Even my total performance was better (783 vs.777).
I am very frustrated with this unrealistic outcome.
This is not just about this game. I've noticed that this happens very often when it comes to player aggression and referee strictness, and that the algorithm favors teams with higher aggression players. It's practically impossible to beat a team with high aggression players if they set their team aggression to maximum.
I think that's wrong and very unrealistic.
I've just check all games from the season 119 of the team Er2c. He also has a low aggression players like mine. Minimum 7 games from the last season had an unrealistic outcome.
My next league game is against a similar team with high aggression players and max team aggression and the referee is also has high strictness. It will be interesting to see what will happen.
If there is something in this story that I don't see or understand or am wrong, I would like someone to enlighten me. Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Delboy
Peckham B.1
The very definition of doing it all right and karma just being a b*tch for no reason.
