To many 70 - 80% players
Moderators: Moderator, Programmer
To many 70 - 80% players
70-80% players are to common in my opinion, since when do division 5 (which would be E) teams have teams full of players rated 70%?
I reckon the chances of getting players at decent levels should work something like this
100-90% = 1-100 players
90-80%= 5-100 players
80-70%= 10- 100 players
70-60%= 19-100 players
60-50%= 25-100 Players
50-40%=40-100 players
No one should max below 40%
This would mean having players at around 60% would be good rather then having someone at 80% which in the real world would be a top class player.
I reckon the chances of getting players at decent levels should work something like this
100-90% = 1-100 players
90-80%= 5-100 players
80-70%= 10- 100 players
70-60%= 19-100 players
60-50%= 25-100 Players
50-40%=40-100 players
No one should max below 40%
This would mean having players at around 60% would be good rather then having someone at 80% which in the real world would be a top class player.
Join www.footytalking.tk, unpopular at moment but please help change that by joining 

Can I ask why some of you dislike the idea?
Join www.footytalking.tk, unpopular at moment but please help change that by joining 

-
- Team President
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 2:53 pm
- Location: England , Grimsby , Scartho
- Contact:
because top teams like real madrid have ronaldo ,zidane .beckham and top teams on soccerproject have the odd 90% which are very good players but teams liek mine have the odd 80% player in it so makes me like a not so good team in real life if you get me
so insted of a 80% being top quality a 90% is:)
so insted of a 80% being top quality a 90% is:)
Manager : Cooper
Team : Fc Cooper
The NeverLose Stadium
Play Me If You Dare
Team : Fc Cooper
The NeverLose Stadium
Play Me If You Dare
But no division 5 team as an 80% player in reality. The current system means the magority of the first eleven in most teams from E to A have players rated 70-100% so the players below 70% are preety much worthless, and when you get teams ratings in E as high as thoughs in A its just totaly unrealsitic.
Join www.footytalking.tk, unpopular at moment but please help change that by joining 

-
- Team President
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 2:53 pm
- Location: England , Grimsby , Scartho
- Contact:
How is it better? Its unrealsitic
Join www.footytalking.tk, unpopular at moment but please help change that by joining 

-
- Team Manager
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:49 pm
- Location: england/ grimsby
- Contact:
so does it hav to be realsitic 

manager: man.utd
team:..fc..man..utd..
league: F.194
season 7: G.580= 3rd
season 8: G.580= 2nd
season 9: F.194= 2nd
season 10: E.65= 8th
season 11: E.65= ???
team:..fc..man..utd..
league: F.194
season 7: G.580= 3rd
season 8: G.580= 2nd
season 9: F.194= 2nd
season 10: E.65= 8th
season 11: E.65= ???
No it doesnt have to be relistic, but the top quality players of 90% dont seem to be worth what they should be when there so many high 70s and 80s around
Join www.footytalking.tk, unpopular at moment but please help change that by joining 

-
- Team President
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 2:53 pm
- Location: England , Grimsby , Scartho
- Contact: