SPFA Feature - Seperate Servers

Curiosity · Post by **Curiosity** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:45 am

As I understand, SP has recently purchased a new server from the SPFA membership money.

I think it would be a good idea to implement a 'premium server' and a 'public server'; one for SPFA members and the latter for public use. This would be a good incentive for managers to contribute towards SP as the website is notoriously slow at times.

Benjamin · Post by **Benjamin** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:58 pm

Curiosity wrote:As I understand, SP has recently purchased a new server from the SPFA membership money.

I think it would be a good idea to implement a 'premium server' and a 'public server'; one for SPFA members and the latter for public use. This would be a good incentive for managers to contribute towards SP as the website is notoriously slow at times.

There are way too less managers that have SPFA, to 'give' them their own server. + It would make the game more slow, because you lose a server...

Not a good idea, me thinks

robborover · Post by **robborover** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:58 pm

i like the idea of splitting sp. maybe just split the game anyway. that would also make it easier for new managers to reach division a.

Curiosity · Post by **Curiosity** » Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:39 pm

If you think it's too slow, contribute and you'll be wizzing around full-speed. It's good business sense and as it stands there's very little benefit from being SPFA.

Michal Kejchal · Post by **Michal Kejchal** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:33 am

Curiosity wrote:If you think it's too slow, contribute and you'll be wizzing around full-speed. It's good business sense and as it stands there's very little benefit from being SPFA.

Your attitude is a little bit elitist but useful I think. Another question is if its possible technically.

SoccerProject

SPFA Feature - Seperate Servers

SPFA Feature - Seperate Servers

Re: SPFA Feature - Seperate Servers