Page 1 of 2

New pyramid top?

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:58 am
by keyelpk
in many european countries the 2nd level of football is with nationwide division. what's your oppinion- is there room for changing a bit the format at the very top in sp?

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:08 pm
by sljivovica
what do you mean?

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:44 pm
by mosmartin
I think he wants A B C... leagues for each countries.

But this will change the game to much.

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:32 am
by keyelpk
i had no time when posting, so here's my idea
it is like to create 3 A-divisions, wit team-movement between a1-b1, a2-b2, a3-b3, and for creating a new league on top of A.

==top-flight==
a1 a2 a3
b1 b2 b3
==continuing as usual==


or, here is another suggestion, so now teams from b123 promote to A. so there can be added few As one on top of the others, and the top-flight at the very top?

==top-flight==
=A1=
=A2=
[=A3=]
[=A4=]
==continuing as usual==

There are enormous possibilities wit virtualy adding no teams.

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:43 am
by bunicutzu
but ... why? what's the point?

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:50 am
by mosmartin
It will be exactly as it is now, just with other names.
So what's the point?

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:26 am
by dardar_3
The point is that you can promote easy to A... whatever... A1, A2, A3.... :lol:

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:31 am
by keyelpk
ok just to summon my english.
at this time in every sp-division the last 6 get relegated. it is esyer for me if just for a sec we assume my idea is implemented

like, a team playing in b1 promotes to div called a4. the top [let's say] 3 teams go to div called a3, an then a2, and then a1, and then to a very top division, for wich to determine the champion. overall, it's adding 64 new teams. it is no name-changing, it is "building on top" of the now existing.
this idea may help strong teams to battle it out without serious fear of relegation.

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:34 am
by mosmartin
We figure that out. This idea will decrease competition.
If you are in A1 and there is a better division then A1 then it's just like you are in B1 but you are calling it A.

I like it the way it is.

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:39 am
by keyelpk
if you look closely, my idea will just make it harder to be "champion". now, a team coming from B must deal with 15 teams in 1 season to be champion. one thing. but if the theam must battle 4 times that before reaching the actual top?

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:43 am
by keyelpk
maan i just can not explain it...

the game is like a tower of paper cups [for drrinking]. the top cup is div A. imagine that we put few more "cups" on top of A...

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:16 am
by ilario
No

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:19 am
by warchilde
but why would you put more cups??? you tried winning A???? saw how hard it actually is???

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:31 am
by mosmartin
You mean that if we have B1 B2 B3 each team from B1 should play teams from B1 B2 B3?

Would you imagine how long will it take?

Or do you meant that the winner from B1 B2 B3 should play each other, not a good ideea in my opinion.

In this game it's only an absolute champion: the guy that wins A league and this is the whole purpose for each manager, to win A sometime.
But, this is extremely hard as you probably know.

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:30 pm
by warchilde
i think he means that the winner of B3 will play in B2...after he wins it will go in B1..then in A3 and so on....foreeeeveer :lol: :lol: :lol: