Re: reject transfer
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:59 am
Is it that hard to go to Team>Transfers>Overview and search for a similar player to the one your selling?
You can easily get an idea on what amount of money to expect from a player and if you receive a single abnormal offer, then you report it. If there are various teams bidding at reasonable intervals and the player is sold at a tad higher price than the average, then that's something I like to call good business.
Or if you are completely unsure about an offer, you can just ask one of the sheriffs for their opinion, but I guess they're usually busy. I've had luck that I had the chance to come in contact with one that advised me on certain offers that were made, but that was for a player I sold at $35M+ which was hard to estimate his true value.
...Anyways, rejecting an offer could mean more cheating. Imagine a manager who runs two teams and rejects all legit offers, but accepts his second team's offer. How are you going to track the cheater if he sold the player at a some-what normal price? Will the bidders be able to object to the rejection?
I'm for this idea if the team rejecting the offer gives a clear explanation of why he is rejecting an offer, if the reason seems valid, then we can deal with the bidder. If the bidder seems like he has a valid reason as well, they would both receive a strike. If either one of them obtain another strike anytime in the following two months from the first strike, then tough measures should be taken against the infringing team. Also, transfers between both teams should be automatically denied for at least two seasons.
But in no way I'm saying that we should ban everyone who makes a high bid, there might be multiple reasons behind it, including silly mistakes.
You can easily get an idea on what amount of money to expect from a player and if you receive a single abnormal offer, then you report it. If there are various teams bidding at reasonable intervals and the player is sold at a tad higher price than the average, then that's something I like to call good business.
Or if you are completely unsure about an offer, you can just ask one of the sheriffs for their opinion, but I guess they're usually busy. I've had luck that I had the chance to come in contact with one that advised me on certain offers that were made, but that was for a player I sold at $35M+ which was hard to estimate his true value.
...Anyways, rejecting an offer could mean more cheating. Imagine a manager who runs two teams and rejects all legit offers, but accepts his second team's offer. How are you going to track the cheater if he sold the player at a some-what normal price? Will the bidders be able to object to the rejection?
I'm for this idea if the team rejecting the offer gives a clear explanation of why he is rejecting an offer, if the reason seems valid, then we can deal with the bidder. If the bidder seems like he has a valid reason as well, they would both receive a strike. If either one of them obtain another strike anytime in the following two months from the first strike, then tough measures should be taken against the infringing team. Also, transfers between both teams should be automatically denied for at least two seasons.
But in no way I'm saying that we should ban everyone who makes a high bid, there might be multiple reasons behind it, including silly mistakes.