Rankingsystem

Here you can talk about wanted and upcoming game features

Moderators: Moderator, Programmer

Locked
Sartre
Team Manager
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2004 12:20 pm
Location: Norway

Rankingsystem

Post by Sartre »

I think the rankingsystem could be better.

Matches from only the two last seasons should count in the rankingsystem.
Season 5: ????????? in B2
Season 4: Champion C6
Season 3: Champion D16
Season 2: Nr. 4 in D16
Season 1: Champion E46



Sartre
zilviukas
Team Board Member
Posts: 349
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lithuania/Belgium
Contact:

Re: Rankingsystem

Post by zilviukas »

Sartre wrote:I think the rankingsystem could be better.

Matches from only the two last seasons should count in the rankingsystem.
Hmmm, I would agree about this type of ranking system. But in this system you cannot see which manager collected the highest quantity of points in all the history.

Double rating? Rating of last two months and rating of all times?
OPA F.C.
pelsen
Member of the Soccer Project Association
Posts: 1611
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 8:48 pm
Location: Betekom

Post by pelsen »

I totally agree.

(Maybe this post isn't adding much, but when more people agree, it might be implemented sooner :wink: )
Bull
Team Board Member
Posts: 458
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 3:15 am
Location: Lochristi

Post by Bull »

I also agree, but I think there are a lot of people who won't agree :(
may the MORAL be with you !

s1: 4. in A
s2: 7. in A
s3: 10. in A
s4: 14. in A
s5: 8. in B.2
s6: 1. in B.2
pelsen
Member of the Soccer Project Association
Posts: 1611
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 8:48 pm
Location: Betekom

Post by pelsen »

Why do you think so?
budist
Member of the Soccer Project Association
Posts: 1606
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 10:37 pm
Location: Bucharest (ROMANIA)

Post by budist »

they already have a lot of points, they don't want to lose them
I'm A Legend
U Should Take A Picture Of Me
You Should Be Happy To Be In My Presence
I Should Charge U With Fee
ImageImage
pelsen
Member of the Soccer Project Association
Posts: 1611
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 8:48 pm
Location: Betekom

Post by pelsen »

They don't lose them in the over-all classification...

It keeps them active.
krcgenk
Member of the Soccer Project Association
Posts: 7513
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Tongeren, Belgium
Contact:

Post by krcgenk »

I prefer the idea of Zilviukas. Make a seperate ranking: the last 2 seasons and the over-all. At the first ranking, also the new managers can be on top, while on the second, the people who are playing from the beginning have a higher chance to be on top.
Playing in C.6
Manager of ReesingGenk
zilviukas
Team Board Member
Posts: 349
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lithuania/Belgium
Contact:

Post by zilviukas »

krcgenk wrote:I prefer the idea of Zilviukas. Make a seperate ranking: the last 2 seasons and the over-all. At the first ranking, also the new managers can be on top, while on the second, the people who are playing from the beginning have a higher chance to be on top.
Thank you :)
OPA F.C.
Redtop
Assistant Manager
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 8:51 pm

Post by Redtop »

I agree that there should be 2 rankings, because when you first start playing you are very often not very good and your scores suffer, especially if you come into a season mid way as I did. This caused me to drop a Division but have now fought my way back into division C.7. My results are obviuosly better than at the beginning. The last 2 seasons would be very good compared to the earlier ones.
S1: 15 in C.7;
S2: 6 in D.21;
S3: 6 in D.21;
S4: 2 in D.21;
S5: 3 in C7;
S6: 2 in C7
S7: 8 in B3
S8: ? in B3
----------------------------------------------------
Organiser of The British Cup
crystalthunder
Team Manager
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by crystalthunder »

I disagree. I'd say that 3 seasons would be more logical.
Locked

Return to “Requested / Upcoming features”