Page 1 of 1
Midfield and 3/4/3
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 11:27 pm
by Niophebus
With the last variations the only playable tactic is 3/4/3, because midfield is much more important then forward and defense...
What do you think about this? Which tactic do you use?
This game is deadly similar to hattrick...
Bye
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:51 am
by lexazz
i use passing..
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 11:30 am
by Randall Rovers
4-4-2 Passing.
Best tactic for Randall Rovers.
Re: Midfield and 3/4/3
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 3:35 pm
by krcgenk
Niophebus wrote:This game is deadly similar to hattrick...
Bye
I'm sure that it isn't. Passing and playing 343 doesn't help. You can look at my league game from today. My team was much better but my opponent played kick and rush and he won 'easily' with 2-0. When you look at the performance of my players I was 17 points better. I just used the wrong tactic. So if this game would be similar to HT I would have won because my midfield was 15% better than his.
Re: Midfield and 3/4/3
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 4:58 pm
by Paul_G
krcgenk wrote:My team was much better but my opponent played kick and rush and he won 'easily' with 2-0.
That's interesting. So is that luck or is kick and rush the best overall tactic?
I use 4-4-2 passing generally. Against much stronger teams though I'll use defensive wall and play for a draw, but if kick and rush doesn't give up a lot of goals (like it should) then in that situation I might start using that.
Re: Midfield and 3/4/3
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 5:10 pm
by krcgenk
Paul_G wrote:krcgenk wrote:My team was much better but my opponent played kick and rush and he won 'easily' with 2-0.
That's interesting. So is that luck or is kick and rush the best overall tactic?
I use 4-4-2 passing generally. Against much stronger teams though I'll use defensive wall and play for a draw, but if kick and rush doesn't give up a lot of goals (like it should) then in that situation I might start using that.
Kick and rush makes your offence stronger, but your midfield and defence will be weaker. So most teams play kick and rush. So instead of a stronger midfield (passing) you will have a stronger offence.
That's why I always play Long Ball against a team that plays kick and rush, and believe me, it helps very often.

That is because you make your defence AND your offence stronger with this tactic. So it's your own choice, but personally I think passing is the weakest tactic on SP. Certainely when you play with only 4 midfielders.
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 6:19 pm
by Randall Rovers
So which one is the best to play KRCGenk?
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 6:24 pm
by krcgenk
Randall Rovers wrote:So which one is the best to play KRCGenk?
That's all up to you. Personally I prefer 343 long ball, but most managers play 343 kick and rush. Off course I switch frequently my tactic. I don't think there is a real good tactic that makes you win all games, you just have to chose your own. But 1 thing I learned is that, you should NOT strenghten your best line. for example: my midfield is my best line, so I shouldn't play 'passing'. I better play another tactic. maluyaca made the same mistake against The Naked Chef, today in the league. He has a very strong defence and he strenghten it, but he lost 2 points.
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 11:04 pm
by howie
4-4-2 Kick and Rush