New Tactic

mwosle · Post by **mwosle** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 10:41 am

I'd love to have a new tactic : 5-2-3

Benjamin · Post by **Benjamin** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 11:01 am

Why are you making this topic again? but now in English?

howie · Post by **howie** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 11:47 am

5-2-3 dont remind me

Lincoln City played that and it got so annoying to watch two middys sturggle

although there should be more varitation on tatics.

mwosle · Post by **mwosle** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 11:58 am

Benjamin wrote:Why are you making this topic again? but now in English?

I first made the topic in englisch, but not everybody wants to talk in englisch, so I thought, let's make him in flemish

nenov85 · Post by **nenov85** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:09 pm

I think the 4-2-4 is a good decision for tactic

budist · Post by **budist** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:12 pm

i agree... 5-2-3 would be necessary

mwosle · Post by **mwosle** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:17 pm

nenov85 wrote:I think the 4-2-4 is a good decision for tactic

maby, but with a 5-2-3, you can usa a sweeper

h00psta · Post by **h00psta** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:19 pm

How about 8-1-1, 7-2-1, 1-5-4 etc etc?

mwosle · Post by **mwosle** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:21 pm

h00psta wrote:How about 8-1-1, 7-2-1, 1-5-4 etc etc?

You must be kidding!

5-2-3 is used IRL, I don't think I ever saw a team playing with one of you'r tacktics

budist · Post by **budist** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:41 pm

yes... 5-2-3 really exists

mwosle · Post by **mwosle** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:45 pm

maby we should introduce him before monday 4 am

nefas · Post by **nefas** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 1:26 pm

I have a SW worth 16 mil. that is 87% and growing, since he is 24 yo, i sometimes play 5-3-2, but i have some 4-5 forwards that i could use as a first-team ption.
5-2-3 would be great.
when i use 5 defenders i get 70 % with def wall and approx. 65% with long balls.
it would be more than great to be able to use a 5-2-3 with long balls, ... it would surely bring the best out of my team, an not only mine.

Svens0n · Post by **Svens0n** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 2:05 pm

nenov85 wrote:I think the 4-2-4 is a good decision for tactic

I'd like to see 4-2-4 too
Or maybe 3-3-4

howie · Post by **howie** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 6:37 pm

budist wrote:yes... 5-2-3 really exists

I know it exists

Lincolns manger just wouldnt change it last season

jaluis · Post by **jaluis** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:10 pm

what about 4-4-1-1 ?