Page 1 of 1

Sweepers

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:05 am
by Blue
Do you think that we should keep the SW position, or get rid of it?

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:49 pm
by Benjamin
Keep it, but give it the same things as for a CB

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:05 pm
by krcgenk
Keep it, but give them an individual order. Because now there are almost never used. In the beginner tips everybody says to sell or sack them. So an individual order would increase their value. Off course their best performance on a CB-position should be less (1-2 points less than a CB).

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 7:03 pm
by crystalthunder
The question is badly phrased and it's really not telling us much. I'll go ahead and start a new poll.

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:18 pm
by Nistelrooy_10
I think the SW must turn into CB's. And add the CB an individual order of play like a SW. In real life is that way, we don't see a player that is only SW, we see the CB play like an SW......

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:08 pm
by silverblast
Nistelrooy_10 wrote:I think the SW must turn into CB's. And add the CB an individual order of play like a SW. In real life is that way, we don't see a player that is only SW, we see the CB play like an SW......
I agree with you.
The SW is not used anyway, so an extra IO for the Cb is welcome.

I'll post this on the Dutch forum 2.(not much people come here :) )

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:48 pm
by Blue
crystalthunder wrote:The question is badly phrased and it's really not telling us much. I'll go ahead and start a new poll.
The question is brought over from a different topic. For more expansive details I'd suggest reading that one.

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:13 pm
by crystalthunder
crystalthunder wrote:
The question is badly phrased and it's really not telling us much. I'll go ahead and start a new poll.


The question is brought over from a different topic. For more expansive details I'd suggest reading that one.
I know, I wrote it ;)

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 9:16 am
by Blue
crystalthunder wrote:
crystalthunder wrote:
The question is badly phrased and it's really not telling us much. I'll go ahead and start a new poll.


The question is brought over from a different topic. For more expansive details I'd suggest reading that one.
I know, I wrote it ;)
Fair enough :lol: