SoccerProject

This is my situation.. im trying to buy a player... and as always i have an oponent trying to "steal" it from me... maybe he is in a better group or maybe he haves more money than i have but thats not the point... oh well lets get to rl bussines...

The SPFA member should have an advantage in these situations... for example in loaning money... every player can loan to 2,5 M from the bank...
i'd say that the SPFA should loan till 5 M. (or u think of an idea... im just giving the "start" of the idea.)

I'm not making something wrong, this doesnt affect the gameplay,but since i dont see many futures to SPFA , and since im standing in the situation that i cant buy a player cause my budget wont allow me..

i hope ppl will agree with my idea... and i hope that many ppl will become SPFA with new features

I believe that would give SPFA an advantage in the game, and that's not the purpose of SPFA.
Altough it would be nice for the SPFA, I say no.

what do u mean by "it would give an advantage in the game"???
if u look closely and if you would open your eyes... it doesnt give advantages to the game... it doesnt even has an effect about how the team will go... Up or Down...

this happens like in real life...
If your member of a bank you get some more advantages than not being a member... thats what advantages made for.. and thats why are offerts made by any bank... well thats not the point...

I remember that i've read somewhere that the SPFA members are having advantages , and these advantages arent affecting the gameplay...
What am i proposing it isnt affecting either... just that the SPFA member can do a better loaning when they are needing it.

(I'm taking example of a game... There are free players and paid members... It's a huge game... everyone is playing and such... but when the game is full no people can enter in game... only the paid members... cause thats the point of being a paid member... you paid you have the right.. the free players can enter whenever they want only when the game isn't full ) Here ive given an example why there in this world are paid members (i know that you knew this already, just that i made it a bit substancial... and it's just an example it doesnt have nothing to do with football and other game is just a coincidence..)

Sorry about my imperfect english.. nobody is perfect... even this game.. but let's help it get to perfection... a piece by piece...
And who thinks that i havent thought about the persons that dont have the "means" to buy a SPFA membership...they r wrong...

Non-paid members should have the right to loan 5M from the bank... but only once for month? or you may think of a period... this is only the beggining...

I know that this can create a problem by loaning money... and if you cant give them back to the bank then you have the risk to have your club sold...

But before making a huge loaning people should think if they are able to pay this money back... if not there are always little loanings.. like now...
Maybe this could give ya an idea about paying your credit to the bank if u have the money... and you shouldnt wait untill 9 weeks passes or more... cause thats a big period... I know that there is a possibility to make this future and many people wont regret it...

// I dont want to create problems about being a member SPFA and not being one, i tryied to think for the both side such as paid and non-paid... this wont affect the playing style... it would be an advantage more...
Thank you for your reading... i hope i didnt boored you too much :p

Tibanu wrote:what do u mean by "it would give an advantage in the game"???
if u look closely and if you would open your eyes... it doesnt give advantages to the game... it doesnt even has an effect about how the team will go... Up or Down...

By supporting SoccerProject financially, you will become a (virtual) member of the SoccerProject Football Association. These managers have access to some extra game features. Their teams will NOT perform any better so managers who don't give money will have the same chances to become a top manager.

You have the abillity to receive 2.5M more than the non-paying managers. So in some way, your team could perform better when buying a new player... I think that's what Silverblast means

Yes, in this case like loaning more money, SPFA member would have an advantage. And there is written in SPFA pages, that SPFA members and managers who do not give money will have the same chances to become a top manager.

But lets watch your situation, Tibanu. We are in the same division in the possition 10-11. Really big fight - who will stay in the league. We decide to get a CF from the market.
Suppose we both have 10M in our accounts. The player is not bad, we urgently have to get him, because our best CF's are too old already. So we have to increase an offer. I take a loan of 2,5 M. If you are SPFA, you can ask for 5M. Who will get a player then? SPFA member. That is an advantage already. You get a player and I can not afford him. You change your old CF to a younger one and you perform a bit better already. In couple of days we play in the League...

I like your idea of getting 5M very much. It would be really cool, if everyone could get such a loan (or even higher) one time in several seasons or smth. But I don't like if SPFA has an advantage.

well.. i've said that non-SPFA can loan 5M too... but only once at 2 weeks or once at month?( and SPFA once at week maybe?.. ofcourse this wont work untill the method of the giving money to the bank is not improved.)
so in that way we would have equal advantages if you know when to use your loaning

Tibanu wrote:so in that way we would have equal advantages if you know when to use your loaning

truth

Tibanu wrote:well.. i've said that non-SPFA can loan 5M too... but only once at 2 weeks or once at month?( and SPFA once at week maybe?.. ofcourse this wont work untill the method of the giving money to the bank is not improved.)
so in that way we would have equal advantages if you know when to use your loaning

... you would leave some big opened doors to whose who are cheating ... imagine ... I build another team make a loan and buy a player from my 1st team ... now I have added more then 7M in my account ... the other team may be erased now .... lucky me

well.. it's true but i found a method against the cheater... as it is now.. cheaters can loan 2.5M, but in order to loan 5M you need to have atleast 1 month playing with a team in SP and your "criminal record*" to be clean...
Or the SP would think at a way to give a restriction... it wouldn't be so easy to take the 5M.. (for the SPFA.. well i dont think that a person would make himself SPFA only for the 5M..)

//problem solved cretzu... anything else?

*criminal record= your historial as a cheater..

Do what you want I got 40+ million personaly I dont see why teams need the loan

well... here is my situation... i have 300k ..
and i'm in G..
i'm fighting to obtain a 2nd position, me being on the third pos...
so buying some new players would give me an oportunity to advance in other division..

Don't be so selfish, just thinking about yourself, think at the lower teams, we always need our each "euro"

Tibanu wrote:well... here is my situation... i have 300k ..
and i'm in G..
i'm fighting to obtain a 2nd position, me being on the third pos...
so buying some new players would give me an oportunity to advance in other division..

Don't be so selfish, just thinking about yourself, think at the lower teams, we always need our each "euro"

Well, I'm in F and I'm having no trouble balancing the books. I see how this feature would be beneficial, but until it's possible to pay back a loan whenever you can afford it, I don't see the point.

i would only use a loan if i was desprit.. but at the min am not and i al so try and keep my money above 500k so that i wouldnt have 2 take a loan out. but if i had to take a loan out and i could pay it back a bit later then i would love to be able to pay it back straight away and not have to wait