Page 1 of 1

To many 70 - 80% players

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:01 pm
by howie
70-80% players are to common in my opinion, since when do division 5 (which would be E) teams have teams full of players rated 70%?

I reckon the chances of getting players at decent levels should work something like this
100-90% = 1-100 players
90-80%= 5-100 players
80-70%= 10- 100 players
70-60%= 19-100 players
60-50%= 25-100 Players
50-40%=40-100 players
No one should max below 40%

This would mean having players at around 60% would be good rather then having someone at 80% which in the real world would be a top class player.

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 11:29 am
by howie
Can I ask why some of you dislike the idea?

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 12:47 pm
by shane cooper
because top teams like real madrid have ronaldo ,zidane .beckham and top teams on soccerproject have the odd 90% which are very good players but teams liek mine have the odd 80% player in it so makes me like a not so good team in real life if you get me


so insted of a 80% being top quality a 90% is:)

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 2:24 pm
by Yves004
There are too many high quality players, and you're right about the low division teams owning them.

But a solution is never this easy. Maybe I would prefer a wage limit linked to your division, fanbase, ...

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:47 pm
by howie
But no division 5 team as an 80% player in reality. The current system means the magority of the first eleven in most teams from E to A have players rated 70-100% so the players below 70% are preety much worthless, and when you get teams ratings in E as high as thoughs in A its just totaly unrealsitic.

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:46 pm
by shane cooper
sorry mate but this is stupid but i can get what your saying but its better how it is now

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 11:05 pm
by howie
How is it better? Its unrealsitic

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 11:52 pm
by man.utd
so does it hav to be realsitic :?

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:45 am
by budist
i agree... just that i don't think it can be implemented

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:44 am
by howie
No it doesnt have to be relistic, but the top quality players of 90% dont seem to be worth what they should be when there so many high 70s and 80s around

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:54 am
by shane cooper
therer is only about 8 90% on the game at the minute and just look in real life football there are about that many world class players so its all good