SoccerProject

Ive noticed when a player plays a friendly game, his stat for 'number of games played' increases, but if he scores, these goals are not included. Wouldnt it be nicer if either the goals were also included in these stats, instead of just league goals, or not to include any friendly stats? Its only a minor thing, just that I often see strikers that have played lots of games but don't appear to have scored hardly any, but its misleading because he may have played hardly any league games?

Its just relative.
At friendlies or FrC you dont get a tittle of better striker;)
Why would you want to know his gols in friendlies?
Why to know how many friendlies?Experience...and relation to his inury proness

How about a seperate column for 'friendlies played'? I know friendly goals won't give much of an insight, but league goals do, or atleast would if you knew how many of the games played were league and not friendly. Like I said, only a minor thing, but just thought i'd add it to the suggestion box

Better and aprobed, and i am agree;)
A lot better! now i ask it too!

i find do one thing.. so count the games and goals of every game or count only leaguegames an goals

rubens wrote:Its just relative.
At friendlies or FrC you dont get a tittle of better striker;)
Why would you want to know his gols in friendlies?
Why to know how many friendlies?Experience...and relation to his inury proness

if you need to play friendlies to help train your players and boost morale then their goals / performances SHOULD count. otherwise the games / goals ratio doesn't mean anything.

As for getting the title of better striker by playing in friendlies; then how come England are npow regarded as being favourites for the World CUp after they beat Argentina 3-2 in a friendly

Maybe you can use the goal ratio to see if your player score many goals, so you want him as th ebest striker.

About all that...what????I really dont get you. Who is talking about performance?
Who cares England in real life? Or Argentina? This is SP!
And i didnt sugested a title to the best striker...

rubens wrote:Maybe you can use the goal ratio to see if your player score many goals, so you want him as th ebest striker.

About all that...what????I really dont get you. Who is talking about performance?
Who cares England in real life? Or Argentina? This is SP!
And i didnt sugested a title to the best striker...

I don't know why you see it as an argument.

You said you dont get the title of best striker by playing friendlies. However, I and many others feel that friendlies are important and included goals scored in them would help decide their best players. Friendlies can help boost morale, team spirit and also judge form.

This is SP, but it is supposed to be a simulation of real life management - therefore it should emulate real life management.

We all know that friendlies give you TS and etc. i just dont get it...

Mmmm sorry you were the one who said that goal ratio dosnt mean anything, so why would help the goals scored at friendlies?
Are you sugesting it? Because the suggestion here is to see the matchs played separated

Yes you said it AN EMULATION of the real life...But what its that about?, I am saying that i dont get what you said about England...

i do think there should be 2 columns, one for league and one for freindly stuff, cos otherwise it could look like your striker isnt that great if you play alot of freindly gameswhen he is actually quite good.

i dont think freindly goals should be in the same column with the freindly and league appearences because great teams could play awful ones and score tons of goals, and then there strikers would look totally amazing!

so id say there should be seperate columns or something like that.

rubens wrote:We all know that friendlies give you TS and etc. i just dont get it...

Mmmm sorry you were the one who said that goal ratio dosnt mean anything, so why would help the goals scored at friendlies?
Are you sugesting it? Because the suggestion here is to see the matchs played separated

Yes you said it AN EMULATION of the real life...But what its that about?, I am saying that i dont get what you said about England...

I think you need to read my post again. i said if the goals are not included in any way then the games to goals ratio does not count. this is because you would play friendlies and not get awarded the goals scored. therefore you would play loads of games and only have a few goals in comparision.

I agree that goals should be shown. the point of the post is asking if:

a) friendly goals should be included
b) friendly goals and friendly games should not be included
c) seperate columns for friendly goals and games


i said that england beat argentian 3-2 in real life. after winning in a friendly match many people now feel that england are one of the favourites for winning the world cup. i am trying to prove to you that friendlies do count and mean something. therefore friendly goals should be documented somewhere.


so i think that goals in friendlies should be included in the players profile. whether this is a seperate column or not, is probably up to the designers as it would depend on how their databases and php coding are setup.

i hope you understand now rubens

Wasnt that easier?
Well you are just saying that you want to see the goals on friendlies.
Well if them would be shown it should on separte columns. Because you play more friendlies that league games or viceversa.
What i think is the main point of Pacifiers is that, tha matches played should be shown on 2 different columns. Games in league and friendlies, so you will know the goal ratio of the LEAGUE.
Because the goals showed are only the league ones.
BTW you just did prove me that the friendlies affect the fan satisfaction(on SP) not that goals in friendlies does matter a lot.
Anyway i live in Venezuela. I am awake, why is that weird? 6:00 am!!!in vacations, i am gong to sleep...bye