Page 1 of 1
transfers
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 4:29 pm
by Vaciux
I was thinking why there isn't a possibility to reject an offer. Let's say manager A and manager B decided to trade players, the prices of player X and player Y is set to 0 euros, but suddenly manager C offers 10.000 for player X and the deal is off. But if there was a possibility to reject an offer the trade could still continue. What do you think?
I hope you understood what I tried to say
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 4:52 pm
by pelsen
Too easy to cheat?
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:27 pm
by Vaciux
why? how can you cheat by rejecting a higher offer?
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:01 pm
by krcgenk
Vaciux wrote:why? how can you cheat by rejecting a higher offer?
Let's say 2 managers know each other. One of them wants to quit and sells his 90% player to his friend.
His friend bids 10 000 and the manager that quits rejects all the offers of the other teams.
And this is just 1 possibility.
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:10 pm
by kjekspakke
how could you reject a higher offer?
Re: transfers
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 1:33 am
by zilviukas
Vaciux wrote:I was thinking why there isn't a possibility to reject an offer. Let's say manager A and manager B decided to trade players, the prices of player X and player Y is set to 0 euros, but suddenly manager C offers 10.000 for player X and the deal is off. But if there was a possibility to reject an offer the trade could still continue. What do you think?
I hope you understood what I tried to say
Depends what is your purpose of that trade. To sell player for higher price or to sell player to specific team? In your case seems that manager wants to sell player to specific team and doesn't care about that someone is offering more. Looks a bit suspicious.
So a cheating example of krcgenk explains this situation.
If the player is in the transfer market, he should be available for everyone. Then every manager has equal possibility to get him.
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 9:44 am
by robborover
seems like a waste of time. if team c bid and cancel the agreement (between teams a and b) then what's the point in the first place?
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 1:15 pm
by Vaciux
robborover wrote:seems like a waste of time. if team c bid and cancel the agreement (between teams a and b) then what's the point in the first place?
well if you could reject the offer, the deal wouldn't be off
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 3:57 pm
by Red_Army_Squad
It sounds good. You can just buy 1 player from a manager in two seasons, if you don´t have SPFA.
So chetaing is net that easy. And if someone want to sell a player of 90% to his friend, I don´t think it would be a big deal, cause he can only do it once.
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 6:07 pm
by rubens
Red_Army_Squad wrote:It sounds good. You can just buy 1 player from a manager in two seasons, if you don´t have SPFA.
So chetaing is net that easy. And if someone want to sell a player of 90% to his friend, I don´t think it would be a big deal, cause he can only do it once.
And the other 11k managers that want that player?
Wont be unfair that you sell it by 10k ~euros??
Come one this is a stupid idea...That transfer system was already changed.
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:46 am
by robborover
rubens wrote:Red_Army_Squad wrote:It sounds good. You can just buy 1 player from a manager in two seasons, if you don´t have SPFA.
So chetaing is net that easy. And if someone want to sell a player of 90% to his friend, I don´t think it would be a big deal, cause he can only do it once.
And the other 11k managers that want that player?
Wont be unfair that you sell it by 10k ~euros??
Come one this is a stupid idea...That transfer system was already changed.
i agree rubens. this idea won't improve anything.