Page 1 of 1
cup per division
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:47 am
by kilian
can't there be a cup for like and all of SP and a cup per division?
i know this is a hard thing to do in C,B and A divisions. But like this we can know how good we are in our own division and we might have a chance to winn a big cup (g,f,e and d don't stand a chance for the SP cup)
Is this a good idea??
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 12:46 pm
by modes98's revenge
Yes a very good idea
To follow on from this the winners of each section could play each other for the overall cup.
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 1:58 pm
by robborover
i slightly disagree. i think a e,f and g cup would be better. and the winner plays the winner of the a,b,c,d cup in a "super cup final" like in real life.
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 6:44 am
by Blue
trouble is, the a,b,c,d cup winner would always win that game.
Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 8:26 am
by robborover
that's true. good point blue.
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:20 am
by Blue
Rather than organising it by division, organise it by the team rating.
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:04 pm
by Nasko
Blue wrote:Rather than organising it by division, organise it by the team rating.
I dont agree. The TR doesnt shows anything..
For example: at the end of the last season my rating was 70%, but no one of my "A" squad was less than 80%
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:24 pm
by lee400
nonono,,,
The rating is the global rating of ALL your players added together, then divided by the number of players.
So if you get rid of your rubbish players, your team rating will go up.
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:35 pm
by Nasko
lee400 wrote:nonono,,,
The rating is the global rating of ALL your players added together, then divided by the number of players.
So if you get rid of your rubbish players, your team rating will go up.
Exactly..
I mean that the two 70% rated teams could be so unequal
And there are a lot of teams like me (with more than 10-15 not fully trained players)
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:51 pm
by lee400
Oh, I get what you mean now.
Yes, your right
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:29 pm
by Blue
A better way of getting the average has been discussed before. If we take the mode rather than the mean, that would be a better representation of a team's rating. Then we could seperate by rating.
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 1:04 pm
by robborover
Blue wrote:A better way of getting the average has been discussed before. If we take the mode rather than the median, that would be a better representation of a team's rating. Then we could seperate by rating.
haha do you sense a pattern emerging blue? i remember this discussion happening many times. you're stop on about the mode though. one untrained player shouldn't make your whole team worse
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 4:15 pm
by Blue
robborover wrote:Blue wrote:A better way of getting the average has been discussed before. If we take the mode rather than the median, that would be a better representation of a team's rating. Then we could seperate by rating.
haha do you sense a pattern emerging blue? i remember this discussion happening many times. you're stop on about the mode though. one untrained player shouldn't make your whole team worse
You bet I notice a pattern
It'll always be the same.