spfa trial

[jojojo]

i think they should do the spfa trial once a year so the new managers can get a taste of spfa what do u think

[modes98's revenge]

If they consider this then they would have to only select new managers otherwise i think the subscriptions would go down!

I for one would reconsider!

[robborover]

only if i get 3 weeks extra for already being a member. if not just newbies.

[Ibanezamer]

I vote no on that one. I pay money because I want a little bit more than thoose who doesnt pay. And to sponsor the game makers.

To lure other players into spfa, we have to do it more intressting, more features and more options. and I think thats the things we should discuss...

[Benjamin]

Everybody already had 3 weeks of SPFA trial. Everybody had the chance to test it out. So NO!

[robborover]

To lure other players into spfa, we have to do it more intressting, more features and more options. and I think thats the things we should discuss...

yeah like adding more search filters!!!

http://forum.soccerproject.com/viewtopic.php?t=48908

everyone get behind the idea

[elari]

maby it should be that way - every new member get (for example) two weeks free SPFA at the beginning of membership.

[Benjamin]

maby it should be that way - every new member get (for example) two weeks free SPFA at the beginning of membership.

That's already inserted They have 3 weeks trial! And we had 3 weeks trial to, a month or 2-3 ago.

[smithy91]

It costs €5 for 18 weeks. Thats about £3.50 for 4 1/2 months, im sorry, but thats not exactly breaking the bank.

If the cheap price is not geting managers to sign up, then perhaps its that SPFA doesn't offer enough to the players. I resigned up to SPFA the other day, but i cant really see many features worth signing upto if im honest. Apart from having more than one available line-up.
Theses are just my views

[robborover]

It costs €5 for 18 weeks. Thats about £3.50 for 4 1/2 months, im sorry, but thats not exactly breaking the bank.

If the cheap price is not geting managers to sign up, then perhaps its that SPFA doesn't offer enough to the players. I resigned up to SPFA the other day, but i cant really see many features worth signing upto if im honest. Apart from having more than one available line-up.
Theses are just my views

you're right mate. i am a member and always have been.

news is nice to have but doesnt improve your team. shirt numbers are the same. seeing who is online could help but isn't a neccessity. the team formations are handy but you can cope without them. they need more of a plug to buy it. something like the management tool should have been bundled with it to make it more important.

*watch as me and smithy mysteriously get loads of injuries and lose all our games because of our comments!*

[Benjamin]

The main-thought about SPFA is supporting the game financial, and not create any advantages for SPFA-members, like that they have more chance to win a game, etc.

[smithy91]

*watch as me and smithy mysteriously get loads of injuries and lose all our games because of our comments!*

I do hope not mate!

Benjamin, I dont want an unfair advantage over teams, beacuase thats not fair obviously, but i think there needs to be more features, perhaps selected by SPFA users that we would like to see in the game, perhaps then more may sign up

[robborover]

The main-thought about SPFA is supporting the game financial, and not create any advantages for SPFA-members, like that they have more chance to win a game, etc.

sorry maybe you dont understand. i agree to supporting the game. but there needs to be a stronger reason to do so. offering features which don't really benefit you or add a new dimension won't make more people sign up.