Player aggressivity and team aggressivity

[Aldamir]

It's very common to see teams whose players have very low aggressivity since the rule change several seasons ago. This is all fair except when i see that a team, whose players are "angels", play with team aggressivity of 100, makrng them a team of "devils".
This is plainly absurd: if a player has low aggressivity it means he doesn't tackle very hard his opponents, he is lazy and doesn't run after a opponent, and all such things; it's IMPOSSIBLE for a team with this kind of players to play with a team aggressivity of 100!!!!
On the other hand, if a team has players with high aggressivity, he can't play a match with aggressivity of 20!!!
So i have a proposal: the system should calculate the average aggressivity of the 11 players on the field, and then the team aggressivity should be set within a range of that average (let's say 20%)
For example, if team A has players with average aggressivity of 35, he can set the team aggressivity in a range from 15 to 55
This should be in league and cup matches: in friendly and friendly cup matches a team can set a team aggressivity that is LOWER (it's a friendly match) of the usual range
If you want to play with team aggressivity of 100 you should have Materazzi, Gattuso, Cannavaro and Nedved, and not Ronaldinho, Kaka, Ronaldo and Messi!

[unicool]

lol...but i see that materazzi in the boxing sack of all players...remember the good heading of Zidane and recently the heading of Delvecchio.

[Zé da Silva]

I thought aggression worked as some sort of multiplier.
Can anyone up there confirm/deny?

[Michal Kejchal]

It's very common to see teams whose players have very low aggressivity since the rule change several seasons ago. This is all fair except when i see that a team, whose players are "angels", play with team aggressivity of 100, makrng them a team of "devils".
This is plainly absurd: if a player has low aggressivity it means he doesn't tackle very hard his opponents, he is lazy and doesn't run after a opponent, and all such things; it's IMPOSSIBLE for a team with this kind of players to play with a team aggressivity of 100!!!!
On the other hand, if a team has players with high aggressivity, he can't play a match with aggressivity of 20!!!

Im not linquist but I think that meaning of word "agresivity" has more components. Meaning of agresivity here is more like "to be disciplined" - like a selfcontrol not like potency to be tough (it partly includs strength, speed and energy).

So i have a proposal: the system should calculate the average aggressivity of the 11 players on the field, and then the team aggressivity should be set within a range of that average (let's say 20%)
For example, if team A has players with average aggressivity of 35, he can set the team aggressivity in a range from 15 to 55
This should be in league and cup matches: in friendly and friendly cup matches a team can set a team aggressivity that is LOWER (it's a friendly match) of the usual range
If you want to play with team aggressivity of 100 you should have Materazzi, Gattuso, Cannavaro and Nedved, and not Ronaldinho, Kaka, Ronaldo and Messi!

Its not a bad idea but Im not sure about authenticity of your suggestion because you have a lot of nonagresive and also high agresive players...so you can earn a lot by setting this rule
Nevertheless I tend to agree with you. This rule (maybe a little bit modified) should bring new interesting strategical feature (but explain it to those who spend terrible money on nonagresive players ).

[dragosh***]

I don't think that this idea will be put in practice but the idea is fine.

[Nasko]

...
For example, if team A has players with average aggressivity of 35, he can set the team aggressivity in a range from 15 to 55
...

If i understand you corectly if your team is with average aggressivity of 80 ypu can set a agresion between 60 and 100 and if a refere is with 100% Strictnes You will get 3-4 red cards in such game