thats even worse...
I think just a ban is fine. It will teach them a lesson.
Rules breaking - more punishments than ban only !
Moderators: Moderator, Programmer
Username: Sir Lee (former lee400)
Team: AFC Bournemouth (Former Yunderland FC)
NEED ANY HELP, TIPS OR ADVICE?
JOIN www.sptips.co.nr NOW AND ASK FOR 1:1 HELP! RECEIVE A REPLY WITHIN 24 HOURS!
Team: AFC Bournemouth (Former Yunderland FC)
NEED ANY HELP, TIPS OR ADVICE?
JOIN www.sptips.co.nr NOW AND ASK FOR 1:1 HELP! RECEIVE A REPLY WITHIN 24 HOURS!
-
- Member of the Soccer Project Association
- Posts: 16943
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 12:04 am
- Location: Gent (Belgium)
I think this idea has a point,
If a manager has been playing this game for example 1 year and a half, and then he makes a mistake, which costs him a ban and his team, he loses 1year and a half work + his gaming appetite...
But when a manager that just started gets a ban, it's most likely he will start over and read the rules before doing something...
Where if a manager playing one year and a half and get's a fine in stead of a ban, he might just continue the game after reading the rules
So you could connect punishments on the ammount of time they spent on the game, to make sure they continue playing, but of course if someone really cheats, a ban is the only option...
If a manager has been playing this game for example 1 year and a half, and then he makes a mistake, which costs him a ban and his team, he loses 1year and a half work + his gaming appetite...
But when a manager that just started gets a ban, it's most likely he will start over and read the rules before doing something...
Where if a manager playing one year and a half and get's a fine in stead of a ban, he might just continue the game after reading the rules
So you could connect punishments on the ammount of time they spent on the game, to make sure they continue playing, but of course if someone really cheats, a ban is the only option...
Lesbuffalos - Oh father tell me, we get what we deserve... And way down we go...
Winner of the Beneliga Season 78, 80, 103, 104, 105, 106 & 107!
A-league winner of Season 104 & 105!
SP-Cup Winner Season 106, 107 & 108!
Since S1 - August 27 2004
Winner of the Beneliga Season 78, 80, 103, 104, 105, 106 & 107!
A-league winner of Season 104 & 105!
SP-Cup Winner Season 106, 107 & 108!
Since S1 - August 27 2004
-
- Member of the Soccer Project Association
- Posts: 10792
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 12:19 pm
- Location: Hulste (m)
I don't think you need to make a special schedule for these types of judgements, but I do believe a yellow-red card option seems very useful..
Just some brainstorming:
For minor violations: Yellow card
- which sets a limit to the transfers (or even block transfers?) for the rest of the season in case of a manager who did suspicious transfers
- which unables the ability to join in Friendly Cups for the rest of the season in case of a manager who played tricks on managers in a friendly cup.
- Which blocks the ability of putting stadium boards in case of messing with the links.
- ...
For severe violations: Red card (= two yellows)
- Just ban
Yellow then always comes with a sort of punishment. Or go the mental way: Give the manager a yellow transfer card so everyone can see he is not to be trusted.
Anyway, I think the sheriffs would have much more fun doing their job if there was a grade of punishments to give, and their fingers on the buttons to decide which punishment it will be.
Just some brainstorming:
For minor violations: Yellow card
- which sets a limit to the transfers (or even block transfers?) for the rest of the season in case of a manager who did suspicious transfers
- which unables the ability to join in Friendly Cups for the rest of the season in case of a manager who played tricks on managers in a friendly cup.
- Which blocks the ability of putting stadium boards in case of messing with the links.
- ...
For severe violations: Red card (= two yellows)
- Just ban
Yellow then always comes with a sort of punishment. Or go the mental way: Give the manager a yellow transfer card so everyone can see he is not to be trusted.
Anyway, I think the sheriffs would have much more fun doing their job if there was a grade of punishments to give, and their fingers on the buttons to decide which punishment it will be.
The Arbiters - F.73
Previously: Olimpia Piraeus - H.171
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools - D. Adams, 2009.
Previously: Olimpia Piraeus - H.171
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools - D. Adams, 2009.
-
- Team President
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:13 am
- Location: Nederland
-
- Team President
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:13 am
- Location: Nederland
I gotta say.. I get the feeling we'd get a superiority complex coming on with the sherrifs .. (gods of the SP punishment )silverblast wrote:I don't think you need to make a special schedule for these types of judgements, but I do believe a yellow-red card option seems very useful..
Just some brainstorming:
For minor violations: Yellow card
- which sets a limit to the transfers (or even block transfers?) for the rest of the season in case of a manager who did suspicious transfers
- which unables the ability to join in Friendly Cups for the rest of the season in case of a manager who played tricks on managers in a friendly cup.
- Which blocks the ability of putting stadium boards in case of messing with the links.
- ...
For severe violations: Red card (= two yellows)
- Just ban
Yellow then always comes with a sort of punishment. Or go the mental way: Give the manager a yellow transfer card so everyone can see he is not to be trusted.
Anyway, I think the sheriffs would have much more fun doing their job if there was a grade of punishments to give, and their fingers on the buttons to decide which punishment it will be.
Season 21: 11e in H.295