Howl wrote:I really do not want to take the time to explain the intricacies of this to you (as you appear bent on complaining about this issue and most likely do not want to learn anyways)
That statement is a little unfair, don't you think? Since...
1. I haven't posted for a few days, since I haven't been online. Hardly the behavior of someone who is, "bent" on something.
2. I think my posts, however opinionated, have always been centered around suggesting solutions rather than simply bashing the game (which is what the term complaining implies).
and
3. This thread started as a post about advertising income being too low and not primarily about inflation.
It's 2:30 am here and I want to head to bed, but I'll start with this and add to it later...
What I'd like to see is an income based more on the division you are in and success of your team, rather than just the ability to work the transfer market. This is more realistic in terms of soccer, don't you think? I don't want to see the game dominated by grocery clerks and used car salesmen, but by people who best know how to manage a soccer team.
My main issue is that upper level teams have nothing to do with their money other than spend it on the transfer market. This is a one-dimensional rendition of what owning a soccer team entails. I don't know much about economics and I wouldn't hold my own in an in-depth discussion about it, but I do know that giving players more stuff to do, (outside of the stadium building which is finished in the first few months of play) would make for a more interesting and deeper gaming experience.
Hopefully my reply makes sense. There's probably holes in what I've said and if so, well, it's 2:30 am, I'm old, and I did my best. I'll be back to review it when I'm more awake.