loan players

man.utd · Post by **man.utd** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:46 am

why dont ya ?

Nistelrooy_10 · Post by **Nistelrooy_10** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:51 am

because the game will became a lot more complex, and it is good as it is. We are not playing football manager

man.utd · Post by **man.utd** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:05 am

yer but it would be nice to loan players out and loan them in

it would help a lot of managers who have just started and if there rateings are low and ofer people

Blue · Post by **Blue** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am

Nistelrooy_10 wrote:We are not playing football manager

You're right. But we are playing a Football Manager Simulation. There are distinct advantages to having loans:

1. If a good team has a player who is not good enough for their squad, but they want them to get the experience from league matches, they can loan them to a lower league club where they're considered to be excellent players and will get a lot of first team action.

2. The smaller clubs get decent players temporarily, for a time period of a few games. Theis means they perform better.

3. The team that owns the player doesn't have to pay his wages whilst he's on loan and they get a fee for lending him out.

We can stop cheating by only letting a plaer be loaned so many times per season, and only once to any team per season. That way cheating is minimixed. But let's face it, cheating's never going to go away entirely.

man.utd · Post by **man.utd** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:24 am

Blue wrote:
Nistelrooy_10 wrote:We are not playing football manager
You're right. But we are playing a Football Manager Simulation. There are distinct advantages to having loans:

1. If a good team has a player who is not good enough for their squad, but they want them to get the experience from league matches, they can loan them to a lower league club where they're considered to be excellent players and will get a lot of first team action.

2. The smaller clubs get decent players temporarily, for a time period of a few games. Theis means they perform better.

3. The team that owns the player doesn't have to pay his wages whilst he's on loan and they get a fee for lending him out.

We can stop cheating by only letting a plaer be loaned so many times per season, and only once to any team per season. That way cheating is minimixed. But let's face it, cheating's never going to go away entirely.

yes blue i agree with there exacklymy point

thanx for explaining it all for me

Nistelrooy_10 · Post by **Nistelrooy_10** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:12 pm

Almost all teams play friendlies and friendly cups, and with that use 2 or 3 different formations. And then will only left the bad players to loan, players that new teams have, or that can arrange in a few trainings...

man.utd · Post by **man.utd** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:19 pm

wount you eva loan a player out or in ?

Nistelrooy_10 · Post by **Nistelrooy_10** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:24 pm

If there are loans in the game, I will only load my reserves. In other words, I have 3 distinct formations, the main, a second one and a third one, these 2 last to play in friendly cups and the main for important game. So I use 33 players. My team have 37 players, so only 4 can be loaned, but that 4 don't have a place in my 3 systems. That's because they are no good enough, player in the beggining of his senior carrear

players that even new teams don't want...

man.utd · Post by **man.utd** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:32 pm

so dnt ya think that if SP could loan it wunt benifit lower leagues and new teams ?

Nistelrooy_10 · Post by **Nistelrooy_10** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 1:10 am

no, it has no need to be implemented in my opinion.

man.utd · Post by **man.utd** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:54 am

well i think it is

has anyone eles got any views on this topic

Blue · Post by **Blue** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 9:14 am

Nistelrooy_10 wrote:If there are loans in the game, I will only load my reserves. In other words, I have 3 distinct formations, the main, a second one and a third one, these 2 last to play in friendly cups and the main for important game. So I use 33 players. My team have 37 players, so only 4 can be loaned, but that 4 don't have a place in my 3 systems. That's because they are no good enough, player in the beggining of his senior carrear

players that even new teams don't want...

This may well be what you'd do, but others won't. It'd be a good source of income and it'd give the players in those last two squads the chance to play league games, so they gain more experience.

Vaciux · Post by **Vaciux** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 9:19 am

I think that it would be great to loan players, cause as blue said the players who aren't good enogh for your a squad would get experience and become better players

man.utd · Post by **man.utd** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 11:46 am

yup so realli it can beifit the team who the player goes to coz it will help there team and it will help the team who the player came from coz then the player might become a better playe.

Blue · Post by **Blue** » Sat Oct 29, 2005 12:19 pm

man.utd wrote:yup so realli it can beifit the team who the player goes to coz it will help there team and it will help the team who the player came from coz then the player might become a better playe.

Exactly.