cup per division

kilian · Post by **kilian** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:47 am

can't there be a cup for like and all of SP and a cup per division?
i know this is a hard thing to do in C,B and A divisions. But like this we can know how good we are in our own division and we might have a chance to winn a big cup (g,f,e and d don't stand a chance for the SP cup)
Is this a good idea??

modes98's revenge · Post by **modes98's revenge** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 12:46 pm

Yes a very good idea

To follow on from this the winners of each section could play each other for the overall cup.

robborover · Post by **robborover** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 1:58 pm

i slightly disagree. i think a e,f and g cup would be better. and the winner plays the winner of the a,b,c,d cup in a "super cup final" like in real life.

Blue · Post by **Blue** » Tue Jun 06, 2006 6:44 am

trouble is, the a,b,c,d cup winner would always win that game.

robborover · Post by **robborover** » Tue Jun 06, 2006 8:26 am

that's true. good point blue.

Blue · Post by **Blue** » Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:20 am

Rather than organising it by division, organise it by the team rating.

Nasko · Post by **Nasko** » Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:04 pm

Blue wrote:Rather than organising it by division, organise it by the team rating.

I dont agree. The TR doesnt shows anything..

For example: at the end of the last season my rating was 70%, but no one of my "A" squad was less than 80%

lee400 · Post by **lee400** » Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:24 pm

nonono,,,

The rating is the global rating of ALL your players added together, then divided by the number of players.

So if you get rid of your rubbish players, your team rating will go up.

Nasko · Post by **Nasko** » Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:35 pm

lee400 wrote:nonono,,,

The rating is the global rating of ALL your players added together, then divided by the number of players.

So if you get rid of your rubbish players, your team rating will go up.

Exactly..
I mean that the two 70% rated teams could be so unequal
And there are a lot of teams like me (with more than 10-15 not fully trained players)

lee400 · Post by **lee400** » Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:51 pm

Oh, I get what you mean now.
Yes, your right

Blue · Post by **Blue** » Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:29 pm

A better way of getting the average has been discussed before. If we take the mode rather than the mean, that would be a better representation of a team's rating. Then we could seperate by rating.

robborover · Post by **robborover** » Sun Jun 11, 2006 1:04 pm

Blue wrote:A better way of getting the average has been discussed before. If we take the mode rather than the median, that would be a better representation of a team's rating. Then we could seperate by rating.

haha do you sense a pattern emerging blue? i remember this discussion happening many times. you're stop on about the mode though. one untrained player shouldn't make your whole team worse

Blue · Post by **Blue** » Sun Jun 11, 2006 4:15 pm

robborover wrote:
Blue wrote:A better way of getting the average has been discussed before. If we take the mode rather than the median, that would be a better representation of a team's rating. Then we could seperate by rating.
haha do you sense a pattern emerging blue? i remember this discussion happening many times. you're stop on about the mode though. one untrained player shouldn't make your whole team worse

You bet I notice a pattern

It'll always be the same.