SP CL and SP UEFA
Moderators: Moderator, Programmer
- 
				sljivovica
 - Member of the Soccer Project Association
 - Posts: 4424
 - Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 3:39 pm
 - Location: Enschede, Nederland
 - Contact:
 
Having a CL for every Division is no good... there can only be 1 CL in my opinion. And it's fun, there are some B and even C-teams that are about equal to most A-teams, so you can not predict who will win.chetkamotoretka wrote:I think the idea is great,but only if there are SP CL and SP UEFA for each division...otherwise it is useless A-division team to play with a G,F,even E-division.The A team can lose only if it plays with all his reserves...which is really stupid to play a CL Semi-final or final with reserves
The UEFA-Cup is a little more difficult, it's not really nice to exclude C-teams for instance, because a lot of C-teams are not good enough for the CL, and are not allowed to play UEFA, so they can never win either Cup
But that's fair enough, a UEFA-Cup for D-G teams should be good enough, D&E are already pretty strong, so it's an interesting Cup. And it's perfectly fine that G-players have no chance of winning, you can't expect to start playing SP and within 1 or 2 seasons win the UEFA-Cup
Grow, move on to F/E/D, and then start to compete...
But one problem I have with making the CL/UEFA official, integrate it into SP, is that we would get matches on saturday/sunday 04:00, right?
Which makes it much harder to manage your team in terms of condition and morale
FC Wageningen
S2: started in E.34
S13 - S19..: B.2
S20..: A!! (12th)
S21 - S22: B.2
S23..: A!! (15e)
S24-26: B.2 (12e)
S27 & onwards: C-division and lower.
Currently (S41): E.45
						S2: started in E.34
S13 - S19..: B.2
S20..: A!! (12th)
S21 - S22: B.2
S23..: A!! (15e)
S24-26: B.2 (12e)
S27 & onwards: C-division and lower.
Currently (S41): E.45
- 
				Benjamin
 - Member of the Soccer Project Association
 - Posts: 7213
 - Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 9:02 am
 - Location: Peer, België
 - Contact:
 
So team X plays against team Y in stadion S.
X and Y need to pay 50% (-each!-) of the prize that the owner of Stadion S is asking (example: 10 000 € / 1.000 seats)
The status of the field will go down as a normal game. But like i said before somewhere in the English topics, this idea will create such a big gap between the smaller stadiums and the bigger, because everyone wants to play in a big(ger) stadium than a 4.000 stadium. The owner of the bigger stadiums will earn so much money that they can enlarge their stadium so much times...
			
			
									
									X and Y need to pay 50% (-each!-) of the prize that the owner of Stadion S is asking (example: 10 000 € / 1.000 seats)
The status of the field will go down as a normal game. But like i said before somewhere in the English topics, this idea will create such a big gap between the smaller stadiums and the bigger, because everyone wants to play in a big(ger) stadium than a 4.000 stadium. The owner of the bigger stadiums will earn so much money that they can enlarge their stadium so much times...
FC Laguna > Trying to manage it !
						
